Compare MCP gateways for the way your team works.

Start with the product you are evaluating. Each guide compares that product with Toolstile in detail, says when to stay with it, and lists other alternatives worth a look.

Reviewed 2026-10-30 by the Toolstile team. We make Toolstile, one of the products listed here, and compared each option on the same criteria (where it runs, how each AI app gets access, how accounts and sign-in work, what gets logged and what it costs) using public documentation and pricing rather than hands-on testing of every product. The lists are not rankings.

How we compare

Every guide asks the same questions: where MCP servers run, how access is granted to each agent, how upstream accounts and sign-in are handled, what gets logged, what it costs at your size and what work stays with you. The MCP gateway guide turns those questions into a checklist you can use on any product.

Choose the comparison you need

Mintive (formerly MintMCP) alternatives

Choose Toolstile to share existing public remote MCP servers with per-app permissions and workspace pricing. If corporate identity, server hosting or company-wide monitoring is central to your rollout, compare the broader platforms below.

Runlayer alternatives

Choose Toolstile for explicit access to public remote MCP servers, approved shared accounts and metadata logs. Keep Runlayer or evaluate a broader platform if you need company-wide discovery, argument-level policies or content inspection.

Composio alternatives

Choose Toolstile when your remote MCP servers already exist and you want to control which AI apps can use them. If you need maintained application toolkits, embedded authorization or triggers, compare integration platforms such as Arcade and Composio.

Arcade alternatives

Choose Toolstile for sharing existing public remote MCP servers across your team, with separate app permissions and workspace allowances. If you are building an agent product that needs maintained tools and end-user authorization, compare the broader runtimes.

MCP Manager alternatives

Choose Toolstile for named tool permissions, approved account sharing and published workspace pricing. If filtering sensitive data in requests or responses is a requirement, compare platforms with that specific capability.

TrueFoundry alternatives

Choose Toolstile when you want shared remote MCP access while keeping your existing AI apps and model providers. Evaluate a broader gateway if model routing, corporate identity or hosted workloads belong in the same purchase.

MetaMCP alternatives

Choose Toolstile when your upstream servers already offer public HTTPS endpoints and you want the access layer managed for you. If you still need to run local server processes or translate protocols, compare the runtimes below.

Obot alternatives

Choose Toolstile for a managed workspace around existing public remote MCP servers, with explicit app grants and approved account sharing. If server hosting or private-network connectivity is essential, compare products that also provide those layers.

Docker MCP Gateway alternatives

Choose Toolstile to share provider-run public remote servers without operating the gateway yourself. Keep a runtime such as Docker when tools need local files or container execution; a remote access service does not replace that environment.

IBM ContextForge alternatives

Choose Toolstile for managed access to public remote MCP servers, with separate app permissions and approved shared accounts. If REST/gRPC translation, A2A routing or custom plugins are essential, keep those requirements in your shortlist.

Start with your requirements

If you already have remote MCP servers and want a managed place to choose what each AI app can use, consider Toolstile. If you need a catalog of maintained SaaS connectors, a self-hosted runtime, private-network access or a broader enterprise control plane, compare those requirements explicitly.

Start free · Compare Toolstile plans · See engineering use cases